Introduce type-private access level
|
|
56
|
2308
|
July 4, 2022
|
Package Access Level
|
|
9
|
439
|
May 28, 2022
|
Is there any way to return a *type* (not an *instance*) as an opaque type?
|
|
0
|
191
|
December 27, 2021
|
How does SwiftUI hides private protocol requirements of SwiftUI.View protocol
|
|
4
|
1047
|
October 7, 2021
|
Hiding internal product dependencies from consumers in a Swift package
|
|
5
|
2052
|
September 11, 2021
|
Lazy let: readonly lazy var
|
|
2
|
420
|
August 25, 2021
|
Confused by the behaviour of members in private extensions
|
|
11
|
881
|
April 11, 2021
|
Can you have public(get) private(set) ? -not internal(get)
|
|
2
|
1879
|
October 4, 2020
|
Does the `private` Access Control for the Custom Type works?
|
|
2
|
276
|
August 21, 2020
|
How to define a generic type's Access Level?
|
|
18
|
612
|
July 11, 2020
|
Intellisense Not Showing Public Methods Implemented in an Extension of an Internal Protocol
|
|
2
|
602
|
January 31, 2020
|
Change access control (AC) of autosynthesized init to same as AC of declared struct
|
|
2
|
590
|
January 27, 2020
|
Better Access Control on Protocol Requirements
|
|
12
|
1980
|
December 6, 2019
|
Can public classes be subclassed in non-defining modules?
|
|
2
|
364
|
September 1, 2019
|
Members in type more accessible than the type itself
|
|
8
|
478
|
May 22, 2019
|
Question about access control of extension
|
|
12
|
722
|
December 11, 2018
|