swift-ci
(Swift CI)
1
Report
[FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-debug-osx [#193]
Build URL:
https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-debug-osx/193/
Project:
oss-lldb-incremental-debug-osx
Date of build:
Thu, 24 May 2018 13:31:36 -0500
Build duration:
46 min
Identified problems:
- Assertion failure: This build failed because of an assertion failure. Below is a list of all errors in the build log:
Changes
-
Commit e29c2089a416969ce087e48a68add514980eb653 by atrick:
Rework AccessStorageAnalysis design.
-
edit: include/swift/SIL/SILInstruction.h
-
edit: lib/SIL/MemAccessUtils.cpp
-
edit: include/swift/SILOptimizer/Analysis/AccessedStorageAnalysis.h
-
edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Mandatory/AccessMarkerElimination.cpp
-
edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Analysis/AccessedStorageAnalysis.cpp
-
edit: include/swift/SIL/MemAccessUtils.h
-
Commit 8d67ce18d04d9ebb15b12cf5f7fa7b23e22bd656 by atrick:
Teach AccessEnforcementOpts to eliminate checks.
-
edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/AccessEnforcementOpts.cpp
-
Commit 88a2b4360dca529d263faf1e3d97e9b9df7e2272 by atrick:
Verify that exclusivity access marker producers are well-formed in
-
edit: lib/SIL/SILVerifier.cpp
-
Commit df1b9b404e40471ae1d28ef1743fa8ea99d1bd36 by atrick:
Rework AccessEnforcementOpts SparseSet.
-
edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/AccessEnforcementOpts.cpp
-
Commit c35e50e63be706321bb0ca7a7bf48ef48536374d by mark.lacey:
[ConstraintSystem] Prefer disjunctions of bindings over other
-
edit: lib/Sema/CSSolver.cpp
-
Commit c5475c9442981d2c59ffdbabca5dadb7d66025c0 by atrick:
AccessEnforcementOpts test cases.
-
edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/AccessEnforcementOpts.cpp
-
edit: test/SILOptimizer/access_enforcement_opts.sil
-
Commit dfff7ea96cf201b469f44ac43c3be5a518a3c50d by kremenek:
Update mailmap
rudkx
(Mark Lacey)
2
@Andrew_Trick, this looks related to your changes:
Assertion failed: (iter != storageAccessSet.end()), function getStorageAccessInfo, file /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-lldb-incremental-debug-osx/swift/lib/SILOptimizer/Analysis/AccessedStorageAnalysis.cpp, line 60.
Yes, thanks. I'll look into it right away.