- @adam-fowler / @0xTim - to work with Fabian to make comments re: WebURL in a PR
- nothing actionable
- Adam a chat with Fabian though
- we are a bit concerned about the use of unsafe APIs
- WebURL Proposal by karwa · Pull Request #66 · swift-server/sswg · GitHub
- Franz: maybe redirect this towards swift-foundation
- Franz to discuss with Foundation team
- given that an URL already is there
All - review CodeQL project 1 in preparation for a discussion in the next meeting around how the SSWG can assist
- Carryover
- @tomerd - to work with Sebastian from AWS to review the the Amazon Linux 2023 PR
- Did chat a bit
- Doesn't have gold (the linker) since that's what we require; we don't formally support lld so it's a bit weird
- @tomerd will poke the thread
- As part of evolution proposals have been exploring other linkers, lld seems promising and ongoing work
- ALL - prepare for a discussion at the next meeting to review all Incubation projects and discuss if the status should change.
- Carryover
- Prepare for Core Team meeting
- We should prepare topics we want to talk about
- Both status and things we'd like to ask or request from the team
- @tomerd likely to prepare an empty slide deck later on that we can collaborate on
- Start off discussing in an internal forums thread though
Nathan / RediStack
- Joannis and Fabian to take over primary maintanance
- Fabian to write post about this
- will move to github org
- post already up: RediStack future plans
- @graskind finish updating swift evolution for property wrappers in protocols - (Carryover)
- @0xTim to investigate slim containers based on Canonical's work - (Carryover)
- @patrick to get the final swiftly 0.1.0 stuff ready - (progress being made - working on a PR)
- @tomerd to organize core team link up based around the 2023 goals - (Carryover)
Shared "Minimal HTTP Server" core library
- Franz: mini library that is a very simple http server that's on async channel and NIO
- Simon update the HTTP server requirements gathering
- And then publish publicly for gathering feedback
- This was posted here: https://forums.swift.org/t/requirements-for-a-high-level-http-server-type-draft/64068/14
Running Discord client review
-
What should be SSWG recommended or not?
-
package seems good, but is also not very "core" so we're a bit unsure
- since the SSWG ends up on the hook if maintanance drops off, this may be too low priority to put into SSWG?
-
GitHub - DiscordBM/DiscordBM: A New Multiplatform Swift Discord Library, Primarily For Making Bots
-
Franz to talk to package index if we could get category to hightlight server packages, this would be a great new way to give packages more exposure without linking it with maintanance burden
Add to agenda: -
Maturyity review
-
What should be in the SSWG recommendations