27th June, 2019
Attendance: @tomerd, @tanner0101, @Chris_Bailey, @johannesweiss (@IanPartridge gave his inputs ahead of time)
Naming:
- summary: there are no good solutions so we need a compromise
- we might be overthinking the problem but existing clashes have shown how hard it is to unbreak a clash
- after a lot of discussion we came to the conclusion that 'despite nobody liking cutesy names very much there are the most lightweight workable solution'. However we won't prescribe cute names
- try to stay unique, cutesy/clearly unique name preferred for the time being
HTTP client:
- ACTION [Johannes]: talk to Artem offline
- vote: unanimously accepted to sandbox, precondition: rename [JW (3rd July) done now] & minimum reqs [JW (3rd July) done]
- time box for name finding and other faffing: 1 week, then tag
APNS:
- ACTION [Tom]: check minimum reqs
- ACTION [Tanner]: check naming
- unanimous vote (Ian voting offline): accepted to sandbox, precondition naming [JW (3rd July) brainstorming has started] & minimum reqs [JW (3rd July) done now]
Redis:
- ACTION [Tom & Tanner]: check minimum reqs
- ACTION [Tanner]: check in if he's happy with naming
- unanimous vote (Ian voting offline): accepted to sandbox, precondition minimum reqs [JW (3rd July) done now]
Postgres:
- going well, quite a few Vapor 4 alpha testers
Statsd:
- small, not much feedback but probably won't be much
Backtraces:
- ACTION [Tom]: connect @IanPartridge & @ktoso
Comms:
- Tanner: approved 6 packages so far, so it's time to do some comms, about the success we had so far as forums post
- Tom & Johannes: awesome idea
- Tanner leading the effort
ServerSide.swift
- all parties (Vapor, Kitura, Apple) planning to attend but not sorted out
- ACTON [Tanner]: ask Logan what he thinks about giving SSWG update