Can the `package` access level be implicit in certain contexts?

[jeremyabannister (Jeremy Bannister)]

@wadetregaskis

it's internal which is poor, because what does that even mean, on face value? Internal to what?

A long time ago I suggested a possible syntax to address this…

@jeremyabannister

These current modifiers would desugar in these ways:

internal is private(to: .module)
fileprivate is private(to: .file)
private is private(to: .type)