What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.py
It has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
- Daniel
···
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com> Runtime Wrangler
I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan.
Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved?
- Daniel
···
On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gparker@apple.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com> Runtime Wrangler
For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected fail. Linux is actually broken.
···
On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan.
Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved?
- Daniel
On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com>> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com> Runtime Wrangler_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected fail. Linux is actually broken.
And it's therefore expected to fail until we fix it.
Ideally, whoever added this understands that it's their responsibility to implement it on Linux, too.
John.
···
On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:09 AM, William Dillon via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan.
Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved?
- Daniel
On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com>> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com> Runtime Wrangler_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
Todd and I had a quick chat, he is going to XFail this test but I will not publish new toolchains till we re-enable this test.
Thanks,
Mishal Shah
···
On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:12 AM, John McCall via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:09 AM, William Dillon via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected fail. Linux is actually broken.And it's therefore expected to fail until we fix it.
Ideally, whoever added this understands that it's their responsibility to implement it on Linux, too.
John.
On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan.
Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved?
- Daniel
On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com>> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com <mailto:gparker@apple.com> Runtime Wrangler_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
I can confirm that the moving the glib REPL test to XFail does allow a
cleanroom build to succeed on my server, as well confirm that import Glibc
in the REPL fails with the error reported at
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109\.
-Joe
···
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Mishal Shah via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
Todd and I had a quick chat, he is going to XFail this test but I will not
publish new toolchains till we re-enable this test.Thanks,
Mishal ShahOn Apr 22, 2016, at 11:12 AM, John McCall via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:09 AM, William Dillon via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected
fail. Linux is actually broken.And it's therefore expected to fail until we fix it.
Ideally, whoever added this understands that it's their responsibility to
implement it on Linux, too.John.
On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved.
We shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan.Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved?
- Daniel
On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gparker@apple.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure:
swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.pyIt has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being
able to use @swift-ci please test and merge.https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com Runtime Wrangler_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
--
Joseph Bell
http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/
@iachievedit