What if private was just removed, and instead just has a literal description of where the member is accessible from?
public var something: Int
module var something: Int
file var something: Int
scope var something: Int
Patrick
These are very nice and short names. I think that private and private(X) is
better though because it's obvious that it's about access level and not
something else (like a variable name or some other thing). These words need
more context while private(x) doesn't.
···
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:48 AM Patrick Smith via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
What if private was just removed, and instead just has a literal
description of where the member is accessible from?public var something: Int
module var something: Int
file var something: Int
scope var something: Int
Patrick
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Hi Patrick,
Please don't reply to digests. You can use the gmane posting interface
if you want to get your reply into the right thread.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution
Thanks,
···
on Tue Mar 15 2016, Patrick Smith <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
What if private was just removed, and instead just has a literal description of where the member is accessible from?
public var something: Int
module var something: Int
file var something: Int
scope var something: Int
--
-Dave