If adopted, it will mean that whenever I want to extend a class implemented by a short-sighted developer, I’ll have to resort to wrappers and classes that own instances of the lobotomized class, etc, etc.
java.lang.string is final. I will never forgive Gosling for that.
I believe this is not in discussion anymore. We're just debating some
specifics now.
L
···
On 18 July 2016 at 18:33, John Randolph via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
- infinity for this proposal.
If adopted, it will mean that whenever I want to extend a class implemented by a short-sighted developer, I’ll have to resort to wrappers and classes that own instances of the lobotomized class, etc, etc.
java.lang.string is final. I will never forgive Gosling for that.