Simpler syntax for exact-type extensions of generic types

Reading through the previous thread, I find exactly one post asking whether it would mean “Element == Foo” or “Element: Foo”.

The person who wrote that post did not have a misinterpretation, they simply asked what was being proposed.

This entire objection about “misinterpretation” is without basis, and I think it is time to accept the empirical evidence that there is no misinterpretation.

3 Likes