It's very obviously not, given that numerous long-time serious contributors to this forum have given long, thought-out explanations of their thinking in favor and against both Vector- and Array-derived names. Calling the effort they've put into that "exhausting nonsense" is frankly pretty rude.
I think we all wish that we could just agree on a name, but there's only three ways that really happens:
- We agree to use the name that the proposal authors--the people who have spent the most time wrangling with the type, who have the most informed opinions with regard to the narrow naming considerations--propose.
- We have a long somewhat frustrating conversation to hash it out here, involving not only the proposal authors, but also a broad sample of the users who will adopt these types in the future.
- We give up and ask the LSG--presumably a sample of people who spend a lot of time thinking about the language's conventions broadly, and its future trajectory, therefore the broadest considerations--to just pick the name they think is best.
We might very well end up with option 3, but the other two are also perfectly valid paths to navigate the process, and I think are generally the approaches that we want to try first when faced with these problems.