I do think it's possible to transform a closure or a function reference that has a property wrapper parameter so that it can be called with the wrapped type. @Jumhyn suggested such a transformation in the pitch thread:
However, the motivating use case for closures as laid out in the proposal is opting into property wrapper syntax for closures that accept property wrapper types.
EDIT: Remember that this is a general problem with parameter declaration attributes and other information like default arguments. I think it's worth solving the problem holistically, rather than specifically for property wrapper parameters.