SE-0289 (review #2): Result Builders

[Douglas_Gregor]

@lassejansen

My preferred name for the attribute would therefore be @valueCollector . It describes concisely what is provided by the feature additionally to normal code execution (collection of unused values). The actual building is done in specific implementations (HTMLBuilder, TupleBuilder, etc). For those types the "Builder" suffix works very well, but I think for the feature that enables these kinds of builders the name @valueCollector works better as a disambiguation from other kinds of builders.

FWIW, I consider James Dempsey's analysis on why we should keep the "Builder" suffix to outweigh any incremental improvements from alternative suffixes like "composer" or "collector".

Doug