SE-0279: Multiple Trailing Closures

The difference is that if this proposal is accepted we will have a blessed form of syntactic sugar precisely for this case. It would be fighting the language not to take advantage of it. So I’m speculating that it would be broadly adopted throughout the community. Of course I could be wrong.

Perhaps. Of course there would still be endless formatting discussions. But I think in this very narrow case we wouldn’t see too many people arguing that the sugar should be avoided. It’s always possible I’m wrong about that.

The reason I thought this was worth mentioning is that the current syntax is awkward and therefore an area without a clear consensus.