# SE-0279: Multiple Trailing Closures \[Amended\]

**URL:** <https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0279-multiple-trailing-closures-amended/35435>\
**Category:** Proposal Reviews\
**Created:** [April 16, 2020, 10:35pm UTC](https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0279-multiple-trailing-closures-amended/35435 "2020-04-16T22:35:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anandabits](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/swift/user_avatar/forums.swift.org/anandabits/32/355_2.png) [@anandabits](https://forums.swift.org/u/anandabits)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0279-multiple-trailing-closures-amended/35435/48 "2020-04-17T17:15:31Z")

</div>

> [@anandabits](#):
>
> If we go in this direction, maybe we should consider deprecating trailing closure label elision altogether.

I realized this doesn’t quite capture what I intended. I didn’t mean to imply that the `_:` “placeholder” label would be required for the first trailing closure argument.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0279-multiple-trailing-closures-amended/35435)._