SE-0195 — Introduce User-defined "Dynamic Member Lookup" Types

What is your evaluation of the proposal?

Huge +1. I will also start (ab)using this feature for some DSL stuff.

Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?

Yes.

How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?

Rather in-depth study and was following the discussions since the beginning.

Thanks @Chris_Lattner3 for pushing this forward. By the way, Is callable type proposal also coming up after this?