Why are you reaching for the "form..." rule for the mutating methods when
are clear verb counterparts?
We're not using successor(i) anymore, as noted below, and furthermore
c.succeed(&i) strongly implies the wrong meaning. I didn't consider
c. locate(...:&i ... )
primarily because I never thought of it and nobody suggested it IIRC,
but I also don't see how it would work in a family with
c.location(after: i) et al. Suggestions?
What is wrong with
Just to start with, it doesn't form a noun phrase.
Ah, my bad, I had completely missed the point of the problem (somehow thinking in the old model, not realizing that `c` is the collection and `i` to be mutated instead of `c`).
Yeah, in that case I totally agree :-)
Sorry for the noise...
Am 27. April 2016 um 01:16 schrieb Dave Abrahams <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
on Tue Apr 26 2016, Thorsten Seitz <tseitz42-AT-icloud.com> wrote:
Am 26. April 2016 um 01:16 schrieb Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <email@example.com>:
on Mon Apr 25 2016, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu-AT-gmail.com> wrote: