Sorry for the delay, please mail me a copy next time :)
Inline:
Антон Жилин:
> No new suggestions have come in 2 days, and so I have created a pull
request!
> Operator precedence by Anton3 · Pull Request #253 · apple/swift-evolution · GitHub
1. Assignment operators in Swift 2.2 have an `assignment` keyword:
infix operator += {
associativity right
precedence 90
assignment
}
Right, it was planned to be removed anyway, and so I did not include it in
the new syntax on purpose. Added removal of `assignment` to "details".
2. If assignments can't be chained, should they be non-associative?
Agreed, these operators are actually non-associative right now. Fixed that,
thanks!
3. Instead of `precedencegroup`, I suggest an abstract declaration:
operator Multiplicative {
associativity(left)
precedence(> Additive)
}
infix operator * : Multiplicative
Basically, change `precedencegroup` to `operator`?
In terms of keywords, operator will be only a local keyword in my proposal,
so I can say that each variant reserves one keyword.
In terms of name itself, I think, `precedencegroup` is more to the point.
Precedence groups are already mentioned in the standard.
On the other hand, I agree that we should not introduce new entities when
possible.
Overall, I'm inclined to leave currently proposed syntax.
4. In your proposal, `NilCoalesting` should be `NilCoalescing`.
-- Ben
Fixed.
- Anton