private mutating func mutableInsert(_ node: XML.Node, at index: Int,
isNotOwnReference: Bool) {
// * If `self.reference` is NOT uniquely referenced and `node` is a String,
// we should rebuilt own reference.
// * If `self.reference` is NOT uniquely referenced and `node` is a Reference
// `isNotOwnReference` is true, we should rebuilt own reference.
// * If `self.reference` is NOT uniquely referenced and `node` is a clone
// reference to `self.reference` where is `isNotOwnReference` is false, we
// should check if there are more than **two** strong references to rebuild
// own reference, otherwise it's an implementation artifact and we can keep
// old reference (any `node` of type Reference is cloned before it's added
// to the child array).
let isNotKnownUniquelyReferenced = !isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&self.reference)
var shouldRebuildReference = false
switch node.kind {
case .element(_):
let hasMoreThanTwoStrongReferences = (CFGetRetainCount(self.reference) - 1) > 2
shouldRebuildReference = (isNotKnownUniquelyReferenced && isNotOwnReference) || hasMoreThanTwoStrongReferences
case .text(_):
shouldRebuildReference = isNotKnownUniquelyReferenced
}
if shouldRebuildReference {
self.reference = Reference(cloning: self.reference, wholeTree: true)
}
self.reference.insert(node, at: index)
}
I’m using CFGetRetainCount(self.reference) to catch that implementation artifact.
--
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
Am 19. September 2016 um 09:59:24, Adrian Zubarev (adrian.zubarev@devandartist.com) schrieb:
Hello Dave,
thank you for trying to help me. I’ll try to explain the issue with some more details.
First here is some code:
extension XML {
public struct Element {
// public for testing
public var reference: Reference
public var name: String { return self.reference.name }
public var children: [Element] {
return self.reference.children.flatMap {
guard case .element(let element) = $0.kind else { return nil }
return Element(wrapping: element)
}
}
public init(name: String) {
self.reference = Reference(name: name)
}
public mutating func add(_ child: Element) {
self.mutableInsert(Reference(cloning: child.reference), at: self.reference.children.endIndex)
}
// Ignore XML.Node, it's a String or Reference
// Parameter `Node` is assumed to be a clone of a reference passed to `add` or `insert` method.
private mutating func mutableInsert(_ node: XML.Node, at index: Int) {
// Clone own reference all way up to the root
if !isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&self.reference) {
self.reference = Reference(cloning: self.reference, wholeTree: true)
}
// Extract a reference or just insert a string as a child
guard case .element(let nodeReference) = node.kind else {
self.reference.insert(node, at: index)
return
}
// Check for possible debelopment bug
if nodeReference === self.reference {
fatalError("wrong usage of `mutableInsert` function")
}
self.reference.insert(nodeReference, at: index)
}
...
}
}
extension XML.Element {
// public for testing
public class Reference : XML.Node {
let name: String
private(set) weak var parent: Reference?
private(set) var children: [XML.Node]
var kind: XML.Node.Kind { return .element(self) }
...
}
}
Now lets focus on the problem.
Every Element is baked with it’s own Reference to be able to traverse the tree from any of it’s node all way up to the root for example.
Lets look again at the scenario I already described:
var root = XML.Element(name: "root")
var elem = XML.Element(name: "elem")
ObjectIdentifier(root.reference) // 0x000060000026ab40
ObjectIdentifier(elem.reference) // 0x000060800026bb00
isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&root.reference) // true
isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&elem.reference) // true
root.add(elem)
isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&root.reference) // true
root.add(root)
// The reference of root has changed even if the second child
// was cloned and added as a new object to the reference.
// 0x000060000026ab40 <-- was thrown away
isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&root.reference) // true
ObjectIdentifier(root.reference) // 0x000060000026c680 <— new one
The way I’m adding children to the tree is that every passed element of type XML.Element stores a Reference, which will be cloned and added as a new standalone object to the children array.
The same happens when we try adding root as it’s own child. We copy root struct which contains the same reference, then we clone it inside add method, then we pass the new object to the mutableInsert function. At that point we don’t need the old reference anymore, I’m speaking of root.add(root). The problem here is that at that time root.reference has 2 strong references which I cannot escape.
I could workaround the problem if I knew the reference counter value, because I could check if the passed Element contains the same reference first. And if it does and we have exactly 2 strong references, I don’t need to recreate root.reference here.
But I couldn’t find any API for that. :/
--
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
Am 19. September 2016 um 05:50:57, Dave Abrahams via swift-users (swift-users@swift.org) schrieb:
on Sun Sep 18 2016, Adrian Zubarev <swift-users-AT-swift.org> wrote:
Dear Swift community,
currently I’m building a value type XML library which is baked behind
the scene with a reference type to manage graph traversing between
nodes. I also like to COW optimize the xml graph, but I run into one
single problem atm.
Image this xml tree:
<root>
<item/>
</root>
It’s just a root element with one single child. As for value types it
should be totally fine to do something like this:
// The given xml tree
var root = XML.Element(name: "root")
let item = XML.Element(name: "item")
root.add(item)
// The problematic behavior
root.add(root)
If this would be a simple value type without any references behind the
scenes you could imagine that the result of the last code line will
look like this:
<root>
<item/>
<root>
<item/>
</root>
</root>
Yep, that's exactly the right answer for a tree with value semantics.
The simplest way to implement this tree is to use an Array for the child
nodes.
Basically we copied the whole tree and added it as the second child
into the original root element.
As for COW optimization this is a problem, just because the passed
root is a copy of a struct that contains the exact same reference as
the original root element.
I don't understand why that's a problem.
isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&self.reference) will result in false inside
the add method.
...as it should.
Is there any chance I could force my program to decrease the reference
counter of that last item after I’m sure I don’t need it?!
Which last item? When are you sure you don't need it? What result do
you hope for?
A few more details: inside the add method I’m always cloning the
passed reference just because graphs aren’t that trivial and otherwise
I could possibly end up with a cycle graph, which would be really
bad. After that job I’m sure that I don’t need the passed reference
anymore and I need a way to escape from it.
I’d appreciate any suggestions and help. :)
It's not clear what you want to acheive nor can I picture the code
you're using to acheive it, so it's hard to give useful feedback.
Sorry,
--
-Dave
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution