+1
My sentiments exactly. As I was catching up on this thread, this was almost exactly the syntax I was already considering mentioning when I encountered Erica's reply.
I don't know whether it will meet all requirements; however, from a readability perspective in both declarations and function type signatures, this syntax is the first of the suggestions that feels clear to me.
-- Tahoma
···
On Dec 21, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Ricardo Parada via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Erica Sadun <erica@ericasadun.com> wrote:
What would the ramifications of the following be? Each addresses the "confusable with labeling" issue but preserve the inout keyword.
func foo(x: inout Int)
...I think I like this one better than all the others.
I have not analyzed all the implications of having it there but it feels right._______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution