Circling back to `with`

[Dante-Broggi]

Sorry I should have linked the explicit post where it was mentioned, but didn't want to look though the thread, so I should have linked this quote directly:

@Chris_Lattner3

I now agree with you that this is important, and that we should do the obvious thing here: just make self be a normal identifier which is implicitly injected into methods. This is your #1 option, which would allow rebinding with if/let, guard, shadowing and everything else.

Although, I see my example was indeed incorrect for my interpretation, which would indeed require the new overload for the identifier self to be in a new scope. (will edit it)
Additionally, my idea would be explicitly requested, by naming the new variable self.