# Package Feeds

**URL:** <https://forums.swift.org/t/package-feeds/41522>\
**Category:** Pitches\
**Tags:** packagemanager\
**Created:** [October 28, 2020, 3:59am UTC](https://forums.swift.org/t/package-feeds/41522 "2020-10-28T03:59:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NeoNacho](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/swift/user_avatar/forums.swift.org/neonacho/32/1368_2.png) [@NeoNacho](https://forums.swift.org/u/NeoNacho)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 11:16pm UTC](https://forums.swift.org/t/package-feeds/41522/21 "2020-11-03T23:16:05Z")

</div>

> [@adtrevor](#):
>
> Where if a matching package is found in one of the feeds it would be added to the dependencies in `Package.swift` ?

Something like this might be possible in the future, but today we don't have mechanical editing capabilities for the package manifest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NeoNacho](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/swift/user_avatar/forums.swift.org/neonacho/32/1368_2.png) [@NeoNacho](https://forums.swift.org/u/NeoNacho)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 11:19pm UTC](https://forums.swift.org/t/package-feeds/41522/22 "2020-11-03T23:19:04Z")

</div>

I think having both `describe` and `info` commands would be very confusing.

That said, I think I slightly prefer `describe`, so maybe changing the feed-related one to `describe-feed` is an option. `swift feed describe-feed` is a bit weird, but I would expect the package-related command to be used more than the feed-related one.

[Previous page](https://forums.swift.org/t/package-feeds/41522.md?page=1)