Since then, SE-0165 added the missing APIs to Dictionary and Set.
Using init(capacity:) rather than init(minimumCapacity:) could lead to false assumptions, if I understand the pitch for SE-0223 correctly.
RangeReplaceableCollection has a default implementation of reserveCapacity(_:) which does nothing.
Foundation.Data only has this no-op reserveCapacity(_:) AFAICT. There's an existing Data.init(capacity:) which could be deprecated and renamed.
Should a get-only capacity property also be added, to RangeReplaceableCollection and/or concrete collection types? A default implementation could return the count, if that makes sense.