(I am not sure if I should tag this subject with [pitch]? )
Please don’t worry , I am not attempting to start a new
and infinite thread about whether or not the way scope
is handled in Swift is imho correct or not.
Errhm well, apart from that “protected” is missing,
but please let us not start again.. :o)
No, it is more or less a convenience solution to
prevent unnecessary wear and tear to the following keys
on my keyboard: [ A,E, I, P, R, T, V]
I prefer it, not to expose those class or struct members
which should not be accessible outside the class or struct
Currently, to prevent access to private Items,
I have to type the word “private” too many times:
class House
{
private var rooms = 5
private var roofTiles = 11201
private let paint = UIColor.Blue;
private var yearTax: Money = “323,56"
private let garageVolume = 60.0
init(..) {.. }
private func calculateTax() {...}
public func roomsUnoccupied() -> Int {…}
func roofData(……) {…}
private func a{…}
}
To set the scope of a list of members I suggest the
“in-line scope modifiers” (anyone with a better name for it?)
For example if one has a source line containing the word
“private:” then all the following member declarations will
be “private” until another inline scope modifier is encountered
with one “default scope” to escape from it. like in the following example”
The compiler can detect that it is an inline scope modifier, because it ends with a colon
“Normal” scope modifiers, that is the ones which precede the member’s name
directly should imho not be allowed within such a scope block.
unless they would override for that specific item, but that looks ugly.
getter & setters and init should appear in default scope
(or with no in-line scope modifiers)
Inline scope modifiers can be specified as often as
desired and in arbitrary sequence.
class House
{
init(..) {.. }
private: // <—— In-line scope modifier all following declarations are private here.
var rooms = 5
var roofTiles = 11201
let paint = UIColor.Blue;
var yearTax: Money = “323,56"
func calculateTax() {…}
func a{…}
public: // <—— In-line scope modifier
var garageVolume = 60.0
func roomsUnoccupied() -> Int {…}
func roofData(……) {…}
defaultscope: // <—— Return to default scope (only needed when preceding inline scope modifiers are present. )
func sellHouse(buyer: CustomerID)
}
See? looks a lot better, don’t you think so?
it also makes sources more readable because one can
now conveniently group items.
100% source compatible with whatever scope
mechanism now or in the future is or will be deployed.
(The idea is not exactly new, a similar construct is available in Object Pascal.)
?
Kind Regards
TedvG