Evolution process discussion

[Matt_McLaughlin]

@John_McCall

for how review managers can draw attention to these debates and counter-proposals and solicit community feedback on them without excessively dragging out reviews or requiring lots of additional work from proposal authors.

This is the crux of it. Move the task of identifying issues most worth of follow up from the proposer (and the general thread) to the review manager. I could see a couple of approaches:

1. With a three week review, the review manager could do a summary at the end of week one and week two of the particular issues already brought up that deserve more attention. This could be a formal process perhaps summing up what the core team thinks most needs review.
2. No idea how feasible this would be but it would be nice to be able to “subscribe” to a concept at the pitch stage so that you could get a personalized call to action when a pitch enters review. For people who participate irregularly but still have valuable perspectives that might be a nice way to draw them in.