Do we have a better name than “Documentation Extensions”?

[taylorswift]

@jack

A documentation extension extends the documentation for a symbol—it's meant to mirror Swift language feature name because it operates similarly.

well, we now have:

• Dealing with Nested Types when Documenting Extensions with DocC - #6 by theMomax
• Document Extensions to External Types Using DocC - #41 by theMomax

which is becoming very confusing when transferring these concepts over into a codebase.

@jack

Are there other words besides 'extension' that describe the behavior more clearly?

i don’t know, but this was the reason for this thread, to brainstorm alternative terminology we can use for this idea