Debian/Ubuntu Package


(Paulo Faria) #1

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo


(Richard Neese) #2

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with the apple language.

···

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


(Ron Olson) #3

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.

Ron

···

On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with the apple language.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Richard Neese) #4

Ok as a start eack lib has to be its own debian pkg. I have done a few and planned to look into it once I had some free time.

They have to be done in proper order lib 1/2/3 so that if libe 1 is needed by lib 2 it is there for lib2 to build

···

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Ron Olson via swift-dev

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


(Jeff Hajewski) #5

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is
already taken.

Jeff

···

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call
it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do
with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
*To: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *[swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the
community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we
could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d
love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find
out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get
some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,

Paulo

_______________________________________________

swift-dev mailing list

swift-dev@swift.org

https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Richard Neese) #6

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

···

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


(Paulo Faria) #7

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

···

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Ron Olson <mailto:tachoknight@gmail.com>
Cc: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:
The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
To: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Guillaume DIDIER) #8

In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel language, not apple's one.

A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a variation of it.

Guillaume DIDIER

···


ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE
91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX <x-apple-data-detectors://1/1>
M. +33 ( <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> 70 43 18 40 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>
guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu <mailto:guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu?subject=>
www.polytechnique.edu <http://www.polytechnique.edu/>

PS : resent with the right e-mail alias.

Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> a écrit :

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Ron Olson <mailto:tachoknight@gmail.com>
Cc: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:
The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
To: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Joe Bell) #9

I've been providing an apt-get repository for Xenial, Wily, and Trusty (see
http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/swift-3-0-for-ubuntu-16-04-xenial-xerus/
as an example) and the name I chose was swift-3.0, similar to gcc-4.6,
gcc-4.8, clang-3.6, etc. In addition I decided not to break the packages
up; so many tutorials, examples, and packages will utilize Foundation,
Dispatch, etc. that separating them seemed to satisfy only that itch to
modularize.

I'll continue to provide this non-canonical repo (I need to get it updated
for the latest and great swift-3.0), and if anyone is interested in taking
it further the sets of scripts I used to put things together is here
https://github.com/iachievedit/package-swift

Joe

···

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Paulo Faria via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation
swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
*To: *Ron Olson <tachoknight@gmail.com>
*Cc: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is
already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call
it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do
with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
*To: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *[swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the
community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we
could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d
love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find
out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get
some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

--
Joseph Bell
http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/
@iachievedit


(Flamedoge) #10

Huh. Surprised there is no trademark issues.

aha, I see why.
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41

I guess apple-swift would be following the trademark. Not sure what the
OpenSrc community thinks.
-Kevin

···

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Guillaume DIDIER via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel language,
not apple's one.

A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a variation
of it.

*Guillaume DIDIER*

*ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE*
91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX
M. +33 ( <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0
<+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> 70 43
18 40 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>
guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu
<guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu?subject=>
www.polytechnique.edu

PS : resent with the right e-mail alias.

Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> > a écrit :

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation
swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
*To: *Ron Olson <tachoknight@gmail.com>
*Cc: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is
already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call
it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do
with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
*To: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *[swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the
community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we
could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d
love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find
out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get
some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>_______________________
________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Flamedoge) #11

Oops nvm. they are both meaning this swift

···

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Choi <code.kchoi@gmail.com> wrote:

Huh. Surprised there is no trademark issues.

aha, I see why.
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41

I guess apple-swift would be following the trademark. Not sure what the
OpenSrc community thinks.
-Kevin

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Guillaume DIDIER via swift-dev < > swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel language,
not apple's one.

A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a
variation of it.

*Guillaume DIDIER*

*ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE*
91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX
M. +33 ( <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0
<+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> 70
43 18 40 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>
guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu
<guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu?subject=>
www.polytechnique.edu

PS : resent with the right e-mail alias.

Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> >> a écrit :

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev < >> swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation
swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
*To: *Ron Olson <tachoknight@gmail.com>
*Cc: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is
already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev < >> swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call
it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do
with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
*To: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *[swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the
community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we
could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d
love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find
out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get
some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>______________________
_________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Paulo Faria) #12

Hey joes, do you know anything about the process of actually sending the packages upstream to ubuntu or debian?

···

On Sep 16, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Kevin Choi <code.kchoi@gmail.com> wrote:

Oops nvm. they are both meaning this swift

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Choi <code.kchoi@gmail.com <mailto:code.kchoi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Huh. Surprised there is no trademark issues.

aha, I see why.
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40 <http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40>
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41 <http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41>

I guess apple-swift would be following the trademark. Not sure what the OpenSrc community thinks.
-Kevin

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Guillaume DIDIER via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel language, not apple's one.

A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a variation of it.

Guillaume DIDIER

ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE
91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX <>
M. +33 ( <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> 70 43 18 40 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>
guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu <mailto:guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu?subject=>
www.polytechnique.edu <http://www.polytechnique.edu/>

PS : resent with the right e-mail alias.

Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> a écrit :

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Ron Olson <mailto:tachoknight@gmail.com>
Cc: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:
The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
To: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
Subject: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev


(Joe Bell) #13

Paulo, yes, I know for Debian that it starts with
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq, but I can't claim to have gone
through the process myself. My sense is that for Swift to be a first-class
citizen in the Debian or Ubuntu repos that someone at Apple should (not
must) sponsor it.

···

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Paulo Faria <paulo@zewo.io> wrote:

Hey joes, do you know anything about the process of actually sending the
packages upstream to ubuntu or debian?

On Sep 16, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Kevin Choi <code.kchoi@gmail.com> wrote:

Oops nvm. they are both meaning this swift

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Choi <code.kchoi@gmail.com> wrote:

Huh. Surprised there is no trademark issues.

aha, I see why.
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41

I guess apple-swift would be following the trademark. Not sure what the
OpenSrc community thinks.
-Kevin

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Guillaume DIDIER via swift-dev < >> swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel
language, not apple's one.

A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a
variation of it.

*Guillaume DIDIER*

*ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE*
91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX
M. +33 ( <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0
<+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> 70
43 18 40 <+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>
guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu
<guillaume.didier@polytechnique.edu?subject=>
www.polytechnique.edu

PS : resent with the right e-mail alias.

Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> >>> a écrit :

maybe “swiftlang” is better?

On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev < >>> swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation
swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM
*To: *Ron Olson <tachoknight@gmail.com>
*Cc: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is
already taken.

Jeff

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev < >>> swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:

I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call
it 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available.
Ron
On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote:

The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do
with the apple language.

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10

*From: *Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM
*To: *swift-dev@swift.org
*Subject: *[swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package

Hello everyone!

Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the
community if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we
could install swift by just doing:

apt-get install swift

I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d
love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find
out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get
some directions. Thanks!

Cheers,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

<ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>______________________
_________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

--
Joseph Bell
http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/
@iachievedit