[Concurrency] Evolving the Concurrency design and proposals

[Douglas_Gregor]

@Paulo_Faria

Can you please clarify (or point me to some resource that does clarify) why you're not inclined to swap actor class for actor? To be honest I think this sentence alone is not clear enough. Do you mean you're not inclined to make actors a separate nominal reference type without inheritance like @Chris_Lattner3 proposed or you mean you're just not willing to change the syntax for declaring actors?

I meant both. I just posted a detailed response to the pitch to make actors a separate nominal reference type. I recommend that we resolve the semantic issue before debating the syntax.

Doug