Can't suppress retroactive conformance by fully qualifying with module names within the same line

Retroactive conformances are never a good idea. @jrose has written what I think are the canonical pair of articles on the topic.

Even for CustomStringConvertible, this is not fine. I might go further and say that especially for CustomStringConvertible this is not fine, as the only purpose of a CustomStringConvertible conformance is to enable nicer print statements, and in your code you can get those by printing something else.

4 Likes