1

Hi,

It would be great to be able to depend on 'binary' (i.e. precompiled) modules/packages using SPM. This would allow distribution of proprietary modules without the underlying source code, which is an important use-case.

AFAIK, this is not possible at the moment, but I would love to be proven wrong.

Any thoughts?

-g.

2

You are not wrong and it is on schedule of Swift 4.

Zhaoxin

···

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Georgios Moschovitis via swift-users < swift-users@swift.org> wrote:

Hi,

It would be great to be able to depend on 'binary' (i.e. precompiled)
modules/packages using SPM. This would allow distribution of proprietary
modules without the underlying source code, which is an important use-case.

AFAIK, this is not possible at the moment, but I would love to be proven
wrong.

Any thoughts?

-g.
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users