[Accepted] SE-0249: Key Paths Expressions as Functions

[DevAndArtist (Adrian Meister)]

Hi John, one quick question.

Could this create any issues if we would re-evaluate SE-0042 and also use a key-path literal to generate a closure?

Related topic:

[RFC] Key-paths for methods vs. key-path literals with methods

Because of SE-0249 we kinda made the function syntax that we wanted to abandon in SE-0042 relevant again. // SE-0042 using key-path literals \.hasPrefix as (String, String) -> Bool // SE-0249 using key-path literals \.hasPrefix as (String) -> ((String) -> Bool)