How would this work? Wouldn’t T need to be named either A or B to fulfill the respective requirement?
I see; still, I think a (T…).count- or (a…).count-like syntax would be more natural.
How would this work? Wouldn’t T need to be named either A or B to fulfill the respective requirement?
I see; still, I think a (T…).count- or (a…).count-like syntax would be more natural.