Non-suspending alternative to await?

[Max_Desiatov]

@nathanhosselton

Going back to async let, it's my understanding that its behavior may be completely replicated using Tasks, which could also be reduced to single lines if you didn't break for curlys. So then is async let not also meaningless sugar?

No, if you mean the Task type specifically when you say "using Tasks". async let is a structured concurrency primitive, while Task isn't. async let will spawn a (by definition structured) child task that will propagate errors and cancellation, while Task will spawn an unstructured task that has none of that.